Like most of these things, it began with a sick dog. A pet owner filed a complaint somewhere in the northeast. Connecticut and New Jersey agriculture officials reacted. Eight unopened Raaw Energy frozen dog food samples were taken from the shelves and sent to a laboratory. All of them tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. Additionally, a number of them tested positive for Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella. That was in January of 2026. Over the next few months, a small pet food company’s operations were gradually and uncomfortably dismantled, serving as a reminder that “natural” and “raw” don’t always equate to safety.
The main office of Raaw Energy, LLC is located in Adelphia, New Jersey. The business offers in-person pickup for frozen raw dog food sold online. Pet owners who follow a raw diet and are wary of processed kibble have become devoted supporters of this type of small, direct-to-consumer business. The company seems to be founded by people who genuinely think they’re feeding their animals better. which contributes to the difficulty of seeing this situation develop.
When those preliminary test results were received back in January, the FDA suggested a recall. At the time, the agency deemed Raaw Energy’s actions to be insufficient. It’s an easy detail to overlook, but it’s important. Months went by. Additional samples were taken. Four more samples from the same production period were tested by the New Jersey Department of Agriculture in May 2026. Each of the four tested positive for Listeria. The company didn’t issue a voluntary recall until after that, and by then, the scope had significantly increased.

Over 180 products were included in what started out as a recall of 8 contaminated lots. Between July 17, 2025, and December 23, 2025, approximately 400,000 pounds of pet food were removed. There was also one more lot added, a Beef and Turkey Medley dated March 31, 2026. Nine states—Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia—had received the impacted goods. One day prior to announcing the expanded recall to the public, on May 21, 2026, Raaw Energy ceased all production.
The tone of the company’s public statement was that of a small business caught in an unexpected situation. They expressed regret. Resurfacing production areas, cleaning drains and sewer lines, and acquiring a pathogen detection system to test each subsequent batch prior to distribution were among the corrective actions they described. “As a small business, we are committed to doing the right thing,” they said. It seems genuine. The question of whether the corrective plan is adequate is different and will probably be closely examined by regulators in the coming months.
This recall involves more than just the dog food. Pets exposed to Listeria, Salmonella, or Campylobacter may excrete these pathogens in their feces and saliva even if they seem perfectly healthy, the FDA has cautioned. This implies that humans in the home, especially young children, elderly people, pregnant people, and those with compromised immune systems, may still be exposed to a dog that does not exhibit overt symptoms of illness. It’s the kind of information that should receive more attention but is often overlooked in recall notices.
The instructions are straightforward for anyone who bought Raaw Energy products: look for the manufacturing date code on the white sticker that is affixed to the packaging. That date stamp is the only way to identify an impacted batch because the company does not use traditional lot numbering. It is best to dispose of contaminated food in a sealed container that is inaccessible to animals and wildlife. Toys, bedding, storage containers, bowls, and any other surface the food may have come into contact with should all be thoroughly cleaned. The FDA verified that freezing does not get rid of these bacteria. Anyone who thought the frozen format provided some inherent protection should be alarmed by that fact alone.
Although the FDA has acknowledged receiving reports of sick pets since its January advisory, it is still unknown how many animals were sickened. This episode makes it clear that pathogen testing infrastructure is necessary for small producers in the raw pet food industry from the outset, not as a corrective measure but as a baseline. The regulatory framework hasn’t always kept up with the significant growth in the raw diet market. More than anything else, this recall subtly exposes that gap.

