Despite not being the name on the cover of every crime documentary, Jesse Donald Sumner’s story haunts Illinois’s criminal past. The violent trail left by the infamous Crest Hill, Illinois, Killer exposed disturbing facts about human nature, parole regulations, and the brittle lines of rehabilitation.
Sumner was a seemingly normal man when he was born in McLean, Illinois, in 1937. He was a father, a husband, and a barber. Beneath that calm exterior, however, was a volatile nature that would eventually become lethal. Following a disagreement with his accomplice Herschel Williams Jr., Sumner viciously killed him in his own shop in 1963 by slitting his throat with a razor while performing what was ostensibly a harmless haircut. Then, as if attempting to entomb both his conscience and the evidence, he sealed the body in a concrete barrel.
For a man who had no formal training in deception, the crime was remarkably well-planned. Clean, contained, and meticulously concealed, his approach reflected an attitude molded by impulse but honed by restraint. Only after a protracted search did investigators find the barrel, uncovering not only Williams’s remains but also a horrifying pattern of manipulation.
Table: Profile of Jesse Donald Sumner (Crest Hill Illinois Killer)
Field | Details |
---|---|
Full Name | Jesse Donald Sumner |
Date of Birth | January 9, 1937 |
Place of Birth | McLean, Illinois, USA |
Date of Death | December 4, 2005 (aged 68) |
Place of Death | Stateville Correctional Center, Crest Hill, Illinois |
Crimes | Murder, Voluntary Manslaughter, Robbery, Attempted Murder, Incest |
Number of Victims | 4 confirmed |
Active Years | 1963–1973 |
Sentence | Multiple consecutive life terms (100–200 years each) |
Prison | Stateville Correctional Center, Crest Hill, Illinois |
Reference | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Sumner_(serial_killer) |

Sumner’s original sentence, which ranged from 35 to 75 years, was later reversed. His sentence was shortened to only ten to fifteen years, and his charge was dropped to voluntary manslaughter in what many view as a judicial failure. He was only given six and a half hours because of his alleged good behavior. In any case, the result was dangerously lenient.
Sumner returned to society like a shadow with a borrowed face after his release in 1972. He had a steady job, went to classes at Illinois State University, and seemed unusually courteous. He was polite, even soft-spoken, to his neighbors. He was a model of successful rehabilitation to his parole officer. However, that delusion was terribly fleeting.
Young women in the Bloomington-Normal area started to disappear within a few months. In April 1972, nineteen-year-old Corene Burchie vanished. Uncannily similar circumstances led to the disappearance of 18-year-old student Dawn Huwe and 20-year-old waitress Rae Ann Schneider later that year. There were indications of technique in every case: intentional kidnappings, strangulation, and concealment. Shallow graves containing their remains were discovered, where they were allowed to quietly rot beneath the Illinois soil.
Domestic violence, not investigative skill, was the reason why police were able to apprehend Sumner at last. He was taken into custody and interrogated following a vicious attack on his spouse. His inconsistent behavior and evasive responses were concerning. He later admitted to guiding police to one of the burial locations, which was concealed beneath his own garage. The horrific and symbolic act exposed a man whose violence coexisted with his daily activities.
In retrospect, Sumner’s case emerged as a particularly glaring illustration of the parole system’s shortcomings. He was considered reformed in spite of warnings and the seriousness of his initial offense. The outcome was disastrous. All of his victims were young women with bright futures who suffered as a result of the overconfidence of the institution.
Sumner continued to act defiantly even while incarcerated. He made several attempts to break out, cutting cell bars with saw blades and even attempting to take an officer’s gun while being transported. He once again demonstrated his ability to act with sudden, explosive violence when he used a sharpened metal object to slit a deputy sheriff’s throat. He was granted maximum security status as a result of these efforts, but he persisted in taking advantage of every weakness and distraction.
Michael Drabing, another prisoner, attacked and stabbed him in 1981, but he lived through the ordeal and treated his wounds with the same calmness that had characterized his life. Later, in 1988, Sumner was being led to a doctor’s appointment when he made an attempt at a spectacular escape. Before being apprehended once more, he stole a truck, took hostages, and ran away across multiple counties with a crude homemade pistol. His recapture made national headlines, embarrassing the criminal justice system and serving as a reminder that some men will always evade responsibility.
He was a cunning, dangerously smart prisoner who could charm just as easily as he could kill by the late 1980s, according to prison guards. Sumner maintained an unsettling level of composure throughout parole hearings, remaining silent throughout, his silence bearing more weight than any admission.
He ultimately passed away at the Stateville Correctional Center in Crest Hill, Illinois, which had previously held Richard Speck, the notorious mass murderer known as the “Birdman.” The fact that these two men are confined in the same steel and concrete fortress says a lot about how concentrated American infamousness is inside those walls. Sumner quietly vanished into obscurity, leaving behind questions rather than spectacle, while Speck boasted about his crimes on video and rose to become a hideous media figure.
Speck and Sumner’s comparison is especially instructive. Both men stood for a time when violence lost its justification and started to become senseless; when dominance and control were valued more highly than money or retaliation. Their detention at Stateville prison in Crest Hill, one of the most infamous prisons in the country, transformed the establishment into a storehouse of human evil and forced the American legal system to confront its own limitations.
Justice was never fully served for the families of Sumner’s victims. Their pleas were strikingly consistent: he must never be released again. They persisted in attending parole hearings. Their tenacity influenced Illinois’s subsequent parole laws, which tightened restrictions and forced the state to reevaluate its monitoring of violent offenders. Inadvertently, the Crest Hill Illinois Killer turned into a force for change—a somber episode that compelled advancement.